This article traces the development of Private Military Companies (PMC) from mercenaries, in classical societies to business corporations in the contemporary world looking at their continual roles, legal frameworks as well as future outlook. Thus, with the help of the analysis of the role of paid warriors from the Nubian archers serving as Pharaoh of Ancient Egypt to the condottiere of Renaissance Italy and further up to the contemporary PMCs, the study gives a broad perspective on the evolution of mercenary forces. Historical periods like World War I and II, the decolonization period, and the Cold War are explained in terms of changes in the utilisation patterns and attitudes toward PMFs. The analysis reviews modern PMCs’ development after World War II, their activities in contemporary warfare, and the moral and legal concerns related to their activities. It also explains the emergence of non-kinetic operations and cybersecurity regarding PMCs. The conclusion of the work discusses possible developments in the future of PMCs and underlines the necessity of increasing public control to prevent the metamorphosis of these firms into instruments of unlawful state actions while maintaining their efficiency as rescuers for individuals in different countries’ conflicts.

Introduction

Within the intricate realm of contemporary warfare and international security, Private Military Companies (PMCs) have become an integral part of the intricate world of modern warfare and international security, often provoking controversy. Serving as business entities, these organizations offer various military and security services to governments, corporations and non-governmental organizations. To fully understand their current roles and impacts, it is important to trace back their historical roots. This article discusses how the PMCs evolved from ancient groups of mercenaries into highly trained contemporary ones by highlighting their historical significance, growth, regulation environment and prospects. From the Nubian archers of Pharaoh’s Egypt to Renaissance Italy’s condottiere; we will take a journey through time while examining the ancient history of paid warriors which laid the foundation for today’s PMCs service providers. Over centuries of military change, we shall see how mercenary forces have transformed into corporate armies that exist today. We will look at transformative events during this period including two world wars, decolonization that occurred around the 1960s and 1970s as well as the Cold War era.

Research Questions

• How have historical events and periods influenced the evolution of mercenaries into modern Private Military Companies (PMCs)?
• How have PMCs impacted modern warfare and international security, in terms of their involvement in major conflicts and peacekeeping missions?
• What are the primary ethical and legal challenges associated with the operations of PMCs, and how can they be addressed?
• What role do PMCs play in non-kinetic warfare and cybersecurity, and how might this influence their future operations?

Literature Review

The amount of studies on PMCs is vast; it includes the historical period of mercenary armies, the evidence of contemporary private military business, and the reflection of its legal and ethical issues. There are still many publications in historical literature that give descriptions of ancient mercenaries, analyzing their part in different civilizations, for example, Egyptian and Greek ones, by Emberling & Williams (2021). The Italian Wars and the Thirty Years’ War are typically mentioned as periods of intense mercenary engagement; there is rich literature providing overviews, with works by Baylis, Smith, and Owens published in 2020. There is enough literature that traces the evolution of mercenaries, right from the conventional ones to the PMCs and the operational environment in works such as Carmola (2010) and De Waard (1999). Literature concerning particular PMCs – Blackwater and Executive Outcomes is presented in books written by Bar-Zohar and Mishal (2014) which could be counted as sources containing the case studies on the experiences of the particular PMCs. Currently, PMCs have been described and discussed on ethical and legal frameworks in the recent literature highlighting accountability, transparency and human rights where scholars like Sharma (2023) and Buzatu and Buckland (2015) have presented research on this aspect. Today, the newly emerging application areas of PMCs are not-kinetic warfare and especially cybersecurity, which is described in papers by Kumar (2023) and Hoffman (2023).

Methodology

This historical analysis adopts a qualitative and descriptive research technique, and based on the historical materials, outlines the transformation of PMCs from mercenary gangs to today’s multinational corporations. Published historical documents and academic databases have been major sources of information used to develop the framework of the study that narrates the historical evolution of mercenary forces. Taking the examples of the Thirty Years’ War, the Italian Wars, World War II, Cold War and the recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan an attempt is made to track the early evolution and perceptions of private military forces. The study also entails a review of relevant literature which includes; legal docs, policy papers, and critiques that examine legal aspects and ethics of PMCs. Other data includes the opinions of military history, international law and security studies professionals to understand today’s applicability and perspective of PMCs.

Historical Background of Mercenaries

The profession of mercenary, driven primarily by profit, is an age-old profession often labelled as the world’s second oldest. The term “mercenary” originates from the Latin word mercies, meaning “wages” or “pay.” Historically, mercenaries were seen as honest workers, and at the same time, bloody. Rulers traditionally employed them for warfare. Mercenaries have existed for millennia, playing important roles across various civilizations. Egyptian Pharaohs hired Nubian archers and other foreign soldiers, while Greek city-states employed mercenary hoplites in numerous wars. These soldiers were valued for their combat prowess and readiness to fight for payment, often ignoring political or ethical implications (Emberling & Williams, 2021). The Middle Ages saw an increase in the use of mercenaries, with feudal lords and kings relying on them during extended conflicts. The Normans used mercenaries in their conquests, and Italian city-states like Venice and Florence often hired condottieri, professional military commanders leading mercenary forces (Baylis, Smith, & Owens, 2020).

The Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648) in Europe saw significant mercenary involvement, with soldiers from various countries offering their services to whoever could pay them (Thirty Years’ War, n.d.). Another notable period of mercenary activity was during the Italian Wars (1494-1559), where the Swiss Guard were highly coveted by numerous European powers. The rise of nation-states and the establishment of standing armies in the 17th and 18th centuries led to a decline in traditional mercenary use. Centralized governments aimed to keep tighter control over their military forces, diminishing their dependence on mercenaries who were comparatively unreliable. The Peace of Westphalia in 1648, which concluded the Thirty Years’ War, also played a part in this transition by reinforcing the sovereignty of nation-states and regulating military forces (Baylis, Smith, & Owens, 2020). As national armies became more professional, the role of mercenaries decreased, but the practice of hiring private military expertise evolved rather than vanishing entirely.

The Birth of Modern Private Military Companies

A dramatic shift in global military strategies occurred with the end of World War II and the beginning of the Cold War. After decolonization, there came several conflicts in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East, creating a demand for military expertise beyond what traditional national armies could offer. The Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union often became a proxy war where both superpowers sought to influence regional conflicts without direct involvement in combat. It was because of this background that modern-day Private Military Companies (PMCs) developed. Ex-servicemen keen on capitalizing on their skills and experience began forming businesses to offer military services. These initial PMCs operated in legal grey areas, often in unstable regions with minimal oversight (Carmola, 2010). One of the first notable PMCs was WatchGuard International, established in the early 1960s by Sir David Stirling, a former British Army officer and founder of the Special Air Service (SAS). WatchGuard provided security and training services to governments and corporations, setting a standard for future PMCs (De Waard, 1999).

Another pioneering PMC was Executive Outcomes, founded in South Africa in 1989. Executive Outcomes became well-known for its role in the conflicts in Angola and Sierra Leone, offering combat services, training, and logistical support to government forces (Bar-Zohar & Mishal, 2014). These early PMCs highlighted the potential for private companies to influence conflict zones, offering specialised skills, flexibility, and efficiency that traditional armies sometimes lacked. However, their activities also brought ethical and legal concerns, particularly regarding accountability and the use of force (Sharma, 2023).

PMCs in the 21st Century

The end of World War II and the beginning of the Cold War marked a significant shift in global military dynamics. Decolonization spurred numerous conflicts across Africa, Asia, and the Middle East, which often demanded military expertise beyond the capacity of traditional national armies. Moreover, the ideological clash between the United States and the Soviet Union frequently manifested in proxy wars, with both superpowers seeking to influence regional conflicts indirectly (Baylis, Smith, & Owens, 2020). It was in this milieu that the modern concept of Private Military Companies (PMCs) started to evolve. Ex-military personnel, looking to capitalize on their skills and experience, began forming private firms to offer military services. These early PMCs operated in a legal grey area, typically in unstable regions where regulatory oversight was scant (Carmola, 2010).

In this era, PMCs have increasingly come out to play key roles in major conflicts and security operations. The United States’ wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, for example, revealed how heavily they relied on PMCs. These companies provided several services including security, logistics, intelligence and training. Firms such as Blackwater (now Academi), DynCorp and Triple Canopy grew popular due to their extensive involvement in these war areas. But PMCs have also been involved in peacekeeping efforts and humanitarian operations; delivering security to aid organizations, protecting infrastructure, and assisting in post-conflict reconstruction. Their flexibility as well as expertise has made them important actors in increasingly demanding environments (Baylis, Smith, & Owens, 2020). Nonetheless, the emergence of PMCs hasn’t been without disputes. Concerns about the ethics of private military forces like these persist especially when deployed into conflict zones. Critics assert that profit-oriented PMCS can result in excessive force, abuse of human rights as well as lack of accountability (Sharma, 2023). Incidents like the 2007 Nisour Square massacre involving Blackwater contractors in Iraq have intensified these concerns and prompted calls for stricter oversight and regulation. Accountability and transparency are at the heart of criticisms against PMCs. Unlike national military forces, which are subject to governmental oversight and legal accountability, PMCs operate under complex contractual frameworks that can obscure responsibility. The extraterritorial nature of their operations further complicates the enforcement of laws and regulations, raising issues of legal jurisdiction and the protection of human rights. PMCs have profoundly influenced modern warfare. The ability to outsource military functions has altered strategic calculations for states, allowing them to conduct operations with reduced political and military risks. PMCs offer governments the flexibility to engage in conflicts and security missions without deploying large numbers of national troops. Additionally, technological advancements have significantly shaped the evolution of PMCs. Modern PMCs utilize advanced technologies, including drones, cyber capabilities, and sophisticated surveillance systems, to boost their operational effectiveness. This integration of technology has broadened the range of services provided by PMCs, establishing them as key players in both kinetic and non-kinetic military operations. (Kumar, 2023).

Kinetic Mercenaries are the traditional guns for hire while Non-Kinetic Mercenaries are a whole other concept. Non-kinetic (Grey Zone) warfare is a comprehensive operational concept that is applied in an interlaced, overlapping and integrated electromagnetic spectrum, information and cyberspace to enable the achievement of non-kinetic environment superiority. Cognitive warfare is non-kinetic, and embodies the idea of ‘combat without fighting’. Mastering the cognitive domain constitutes a new and major stake indispensable to the generation of combat power. By integrating all the elements available in the information, cyber and psychological domains and creating a force multiplier effect, not only by manipulating the perception of the target population but also by ensuring that the desired reaction is achieved. Here, the human mind becomes the battlefield. It is the weaponisation of public opinion by an external entity. Its impact is frightful—everyone turns into a weapon. It has the potential to fracture and fragment an entire society so that it no longer has the collective will to resist an adversary or even pushes the weaker side to continue to face a stronger opponent despite facing heavy losses in conventional warfare like Ukraine, its people and its armed forces. Moreover, non-kinetic activities can cause material damage and physical casualties like inciting panic, riots, migration, and even jamming air, sea and land activity communication nodes causing paralysis and accidents. Similarly, hacking into financial and banking networks too can cause extensive turbulence. For example, the use of Starlink for spreading rumour of a strike using an area weapon/or a tactical nuclear device in a city/town, can cause large-scale panic, migration and accidents leading to casualties. Similarly, a cyber-attack on civil aviation communication links or electric grids can cause crashes and lifesaving equipment to stop, causing casualties. Hence it is safe to say, the non-kinetic mercenaries play a very important role in this era and will be a greater force to reckon with in the coming future. (Kumar, 2023)

The Future of PMCs

The future of Private Military Companies (PMCs) is most likely to be shaped by several key trends and developments. As the nature of warfare continues to evolve, PMCs are expected to adapt and expand their roles in various domains. One significant trend is the increasing involvement of PMCs in non-kinetic operations (Kumar, 2023), such as cybersecurity and information warfare. With the rise of cyber threats and the growing importance of information dominance, PMCs are likely to offer specialised services in these areas, providing clients with critical capabilities to protect digital assets and counter disinformation campaigns (Kumar, 2023; Hoffman, 2023). Another important aspect of the future of PMCs is the need for stronger regulation and oversight. As the reliance on PMCs grows, ensuring their accountability and compliance with international humanitarian law and human rights standards will be crucial. This includes developing comprehensive legal frameworks at both the international and national levels to govern PMC activities, establishing clear guidelines for their conduct, and implementing robust mechanisms for transparency and accountability (Sharma, 2023; Buzatu & Buckland, 2015). Other than that, technological advancements are also likely to impact the future of PMCs. The introduction of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence, unmanned systems, and autonomous weapons, could very much enhance the operational capabilities of PMCs, making them even more effective in modern conflicts. However, despite all that, these advancements also raise ethical and legal questions that will need to be addressed to ensure the responsible use of such technologies (Hoffman, 2023). Lastly, the future of PMCs will depend on their ability to build trust and credibility with governments, international organizations, and the public, this will be a highly important step. This involves adopting best practices in corporate governance, fostering a culture of accountability and transparency, and engaging in open dialogue with stakeholders to address concerns about their operations. By demonstrating their commitment to ethical standards and legal norms, PMCs can enhance their legitimacy and contribute positively to global security (Sharma, 2023).

Conclusion

The process of evolving from ancient mercenaries to current corporate bodies has resulted in the establishment of Private Military Companies thus indicating a shift in how wars are fought and global security. Presently, PMCs have turned out to be significant players in modern-day conflicts, peacekeeping missions as well as security operations globally. Their rise has affected the international security landscape with both advantages and challenges. On the other hand, specialized skills, operational flexibility, and cost-effectiveness are some of their strengths that distinguish them from conventional national armies. They have been useful in complex environments such as war zones and humanitarian missions where they can be utilized most effectively. Besides, it is important to note that through integration with advanced technologies, their service provision capabilities have increased making them central actors in kinetic and non-kinetic warfare scenarios alike. Conversely, this increase has also come with serious ethical, legal and accountability issues such as violation of human rights by using excessive force or lack of transparency that continue to mar its image and functioning. As we move into the future it is expected that countries like the United States will expand their reliance on PMCs, especially in areas like cyber warfare or digital arms race. This growth will require more stringent regulation frameworks and improved measures for ensuring accountability and cooperation among nations so that PMCs can act within ethical boundaries even as they carry out their functions lawfully according to international laws.

The ongoing evolution of PMCs will undoubtedly shape the future of warfare and global security. As such, governments, international organizations, and civil society must work together to develop comprehensive strategies to harness the potential of PMCs while mitigating their risks. The challenge lies in striking a balance between utilizing the unique capabilities of PMCs and maintaining the ethical and legal standards essential for global peace and security.

Title image courtesy: Quora

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect the views of the Government of India and Defence Research and Studies

References

View of the existence of mercenaries in terms of their implications for the fragility of international Peace-Building. (n.d.). https://global-us.mellbaou.com/index.php/global/article/view/154/217
Kumar, P. K. (2023). The Dogs of War Multidomain Mercenaries Operating in the Ukraine War. Manekshaw Paper.
Carmola, K. (2010). Private Security Contractors and New Wars: Risk, Law, and Ethics. Routledge.
Buzatu, A.-M., & Buckland, B. S. (2015). DCAF HORIZON 2015 WORKING PAPER No. 3. In DCAF HORIZON 2015 WORKING PAPER. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/126604/PMSC.pdf#page=4.12
Hoffman, P. J. (2023). Private military and security companies. In Routledge eBooks (pp. 457–470). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003266365-38
Bar-Zohar, M., & Mishal, N. (2014). MOSSAD: THE GREATEST MISSIONS OF THE ISRAELI SECRET SERVICE.
BBC News. (2023, September 6). What is Russia’s Wagner group, and what has happened to its leader? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-60947877
De Waard, J. & Ministry of Justice and Security, The Netherlands. (1999). The private security industry in international perspective. In European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research [Journal-article]. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008701310152
Gentil-Fernandes, L., Morrison, K., & Otto, J. (2023). Buying Survival: Why Do Leaders Hire Mercenaries? Security Studies, 33(2), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2268521
Thirty Years’ War, 1618 to 1648. (n.d.). Google Books. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=e0QREAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA6&dq=thirty+years+war&ots=0uQnevxA7v&sig=fPeYT-XFZ4far0bkZcGnBmtYn44&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=thirty%20years%20war&f=false
Emberling, Geoff, and Bruce Beyer Williams (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Nubia (2021; online edn, Oxford Academic, 13 Jan. 2021)
Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (Eds.). (2020). The Globalization of World Politics (8th ed.).
Indo-Asian Geopolitics: Contemporary Perspectives by DRAS. (n.d.). Google Books. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=aXHBEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA91&dq=blackwater+dyncorp&ots=ukkeZ4S9Gc&sig=HX7aK1eNROwUsxba48Si6DgzoJo&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=blackwater%20dyncorp&f=false
Sharma, A. (2023). Soldiers for Hire: Contextualising the private military’s legal conundrums. Electronic Journal of Social and Strategic Studies, 03(03), 268–288. https://doi.org/10.47362/ejsss.2023.3301