This research paper addresses how the impact of terrorism affected the economies of Pakistan and India by examining the mutual relations between the two and the overall condition of the region. The research project aims to project various economic consequences that the economy is experiencing along with the direct and indirect financial costs, which include damage to infrastructure, loss of life, lowered investment from other countries, disrupted trading, and construction of defensive equipment. The effects of the economy in terms of gross domestic product, weak welfare spending, and stymied long-run growth reveal solutions in the article. It is exposed that unrelenting is the weakness of Pakistan concerning the sectors that are interlinked with one another and the prevailing safety problems, while India’s stability is reinforced by its diverse economy and institutional effectiveness in a similar perspective in the study. The study also looks at the tense economic ties between the two countries, which are exacerbated by terrorism, and it searches for a possible way that help them cooperate economically to reduce the conflict level and at the same time improve stability in the region. Among the policy options for the nations that must be made to achieve the above-referenced other steps the terrorist-supporting countries can take are international support in counterterrorism, preparing the way for the regional collaboration, and tirelessly trying to solve the security-economic dilemma in their territory.

Introduction

The all-encompassing definition of terrorism is a word that has experienced many changes in its meaning and refers to violence carried out on purpose, usually against civilians for political ends (Laqueur, 2003). The term’s diverse manifestations and the different purposes it serves make it complex and dynamic. The roots of terrorism can be traced back to Jewish Zealots and Sicarii, who employed violence against Roman invaders in the first century. Terrorism has grown among others, such as anarchists in the nineteenth century up to global jihadist movements in the twenty-first century, as an offshoot of the modern age characterized by more organized or ideologically driven groups (Crenshaw, 1981; Byman, 2015). Terrorist groups have increasingly acquired destructive capabilities that keep pace with technological advancements and globalization, thereby presenting serious challenges to global peace and security (Hoffman, 1998). In the South Asian context, one of the phenomena that influenced the political and socio-economic development of the countries, notably India and Pakistan, is terrorism. Each of the countries has endured numerous terrorist acts that not only claimed human lives and caused social enmity but also negatively affected bilateral cooperation and economic development (Ganguly, 2002; Fair, 2014). Terrorism in South Asia is complex, having been related to historical features and religious radicalism, together with geopolitical dynamics (Khan, 2017). Kashmir is one of the ongoing conflicts, which has significantly affected Indo-Pakistani relations, contributing to the fact that local insurgencies may have diverse geopolitical implications (Chowdhury, 2011). Economic loss or cost of terrorism in South Asia is not simple, and its effect is multifaceted. They manifest themselves as current losses in human lives and property losses and further losses in future income in the form of discouraged foreign investment, trade transaction disruption, and increased expenditure on defence, among others (Enders & Sandler, 2000; Krueger & Maleckova, 2003). These economic repercussions are even more burdensome for India and Pakistan, which has developmental limitations and is a region’s key actor. The militarisation of both countries’ security means that states focus on increased military expenditure to counter perceived and real threats, at the expense of resources required for human development, including education, health, and social infrastructure (Bajoria, 2016; Chari, 2012). This research paper aims to compare and indicate the statement that “Terrorism has generated different economic implications for India and Pakistan and consequently affected their relationship and the region at large.” As suggested by the following hypothesis, terrorism leads to economic losses for both countries; however, the intensity of the loss can be minimized owing to the internal and external differences in the policies and economic strategies as well as in the different alliances. Several crucial aspects of how terrorism impacts the two South Asian countries economically will be the subject of the analysis. It will first look at how terrorist acts have caused growth and uncertainty through the direct interference of trade, tourism, and foreign direct investments within the two countries. Second, the appropriation of a significant amount of the defence budget for both countries in the war against terrorism will be compared, followed by the effects of terror attack mitigation on socio-economic development and the shift of resources from core development areas like health and education. Thirdly, it would analyze how terrorism hampers the improved international image of India’s and Pakistan’s investment climate to deter foreign investors and lead to economic stability. Last, the implications of terrorism on international economic relations, trade, and cooperation, especially when there is a prevailing fear and geopolitical tensions, worsen the attempts geared towards stability and development in the region. In this respect, the hypothesis aims to further the knowledge of the economic aspects of terrorism in South Asia as well as bring a more elaborated view of the policy interventions, which can decrease undesirable economic effects yet foster stability within the region. It is because by presenting how one’s perception of the economic consequences is different from the other, the report aspires to open the eyes of policymakers in both India and Pakistan regarding the scale of the economic factor in counterterrorism and the importance of regional approaches.

Research Questions

• How do sectoral dependencies and institutional strengths affect the economic effects of terrorism in India and Pakistan?

•  How would rising defence spending brought on by terrorism affect India’s and Pakistan’s long-term economies, particularly in terms of infrastructure and social welfare?

• How do initiatives to integrate economies regionally, such as SAFTA, impact Pakistan’s and India’s ability to fend off terrorism and advance stability?

• How does terrorism affect travel and foreign direct investment (FDI) in Pakistan and India, and how does this affect how people perceive the stability of the economy?

Economic Impact of Terrorism on India

India has suffered greatly from terrorism, at the level of individual industries and in the structure of its overall economy. The parts that appear directly across the nose of terrorism’s presence, including infrastructure, human causalities, hospital charges, and costs involving emergency services, are termed first-hand economic consequences. For instance, the 2008 Mumbai attacks led to considerable damage to hotels, companies, and public properties, whereby the losses put forward many millions of dollars in financial losses exclusively. Security measures and rehabilitation programs also had more funds assigned to them due to these attacks. Indirect costs are incorporating a decrease in FDI, a decrease in tourism attractions, and a slowing down of economic growth, among others. Terrorist attacks lead to the generation of uncertainty, which in the end deters tourists as well as investors. For instance, there has been a steady militant activity for a long that has affected the tourism industry of Jammu and Kashmir to the extent that it has made very heavy losses and has thus proved jobless for people in the region. Terrorism also affects trade and supplies and negatively affects the smooth and stable operation of businesses, which in turn also helps in increasing the volatility of the economy. Thus, at the macroeconomic level, terrorism affects public budgets, how they are managed, and the stability and growth of the national economy. The perceived menace from terrorism, for instance, requires the state to spend more on defence and national security, thus robbing the needy social causes and development projects some funds. This cash reallocation will hurt long-term economic development. Also, consideration sparked by terrorism may lead to decreased consumer confidence, less expenditure, and a decrease in economic growth. Gaibulloev and Sandler (2019) state that large terrorist actions sometimes make the growth rate of GDP decrease; however, accumulatively, terrorism has significantly influenced the economic growth of India. 

Economic Impact of Terrorism on Pakistan

The direct cost in the case of Pakistan comprises property damage cost, human capital cost, and costs related to security and emergency services counterterrorism. Lives and huge amounts of property have been lost in popular and strategic areas such as recreational places and armies. Another way through which the financial resources of the nation are being used is when reconstructing the infrastructure and compensating the victims. Existential costs such as investing, travelling, and general business confidence are severely affected by terrorism’s indirect effects. Analyzing the impact of terrorism on foreign direct investment in Pakistan it has been identified that terrorism has led to a reduction in FDI. The latter has also greatly declined in the country because people fear for their safety; hence, they avoid the nation. A reduction in revenue is also apparent from this fall in tourism, and through this negative domino effect, employment opportunities in the hospitality and service industries are impacted. Even more, the efficiency of economic activities is negatively affected by interruptions within the supply chains and the general operations of firms. On a macroeconomic aspect, terrorism has destabilized Pakistan’s economy and its growth. Defence and security challenges have remained rampant, and this has necessitated spending on security and defence, thereby draining the scarce resources that would have been used in the development of social services. This reallocation slows down economic growth in the long run. Besides, terrorism induces uncertainty that harms investors’ and consumers’ confidence and reduces commerce. Ismail and Amjad (2014) indicate that Pakistan’s economic issues are aggravated by terrorism in the following ways: Central critiques of the relative economic development and environmental policies in Pakistan include slower GDP growth and higher fiscal deficits.

Comparative Analysis of Economic Impacts

The fundamental challenge of terrorism implies similar circumstances between Pakistan and India: direct and indirect costs that affect investment, infrastructure, and tourism. Security has related considerable expenses and interferences to economic processes in both the United States and Russia. In this area, it was also a mutual effect by both nations that have losses on tourists and investors due to security issues. However, there are differences as to how both Pakistan and India address or deal with and/or embark upon the processes of rebuilding and healing from the effects of a terrorist attack. India’s economy is broader and widely typed, so there are more opportunities for it, and it recovers from the attacks more quickly. On the same note, the Pakistani economy is more vulnerable to long disruptions compared to India because Pakistan is more oriented to specific areas of production. An even better institutional framework and higher foreign investments also contribute to making India’s economic resilience superior to that of our neighbourhood. The nature and approach that Pakistan and India use in managing terrorism significantly determines the destiny of their economic development. Thus, due to the variety of sectors and social institutions, India is capable of mitigating the consequences of terrorism and keeping consistent rates of growth. Pakistan’s economy has comparatively less diversified roots and has security threats that are persistent and thus are likely to contribute to fluctuating growth in the economy as compared to Afghanistan. Hence, out of Pakistan and India, it will be seen that although both countries are greatly affected by terrorism, India has a much steadier determinant in the long run than Pakistan, as described by Estrada et al. (2015). This is because India has a wider economy as compared to China.

Bilateral Trade and Economic Relations

In the history of economic relations between India and Pakistan, the tendency to unrest and violence influenced the different aspects of bilateral relations. Quarrels and security issues impaired commercial relations even if they were neighbours and had trading characteristics. The relations between the two nations can be defined as quite unstable; they sometimes signed definite agreements and fought for some time and then signed contracts for a short period. Thus, the intensification of terrorism has led to an increase in adversity or suspicion and reduced the trade possibilities of India and Pakistan. Thus, the flow of goods and services has been affected by raised tariffs and security checks resulting from cross-border terrorism. Terrorism costs have escalated both security costs and blocked trading relations and thus proven to be a major challenge when it comes to enhancing bilateral trade. Due to the constant security threats, the room for economic cooperation is yet to be explored. Thus, although there is the existence of these barriers, there is possible economic cooperation between Pakistan and India. Thus, in the region, economic cooperation may help alleviate strife and guarantee stability. Mamoon and Murshed (2010) posited that diplomacy and exchange through increased commerce and economic interdependence can be conflict-inhibiting factors due to the peace-inducing effect of trading relations. Nevertheless, it can still be argued that SAFTA and other bilateral agreements can lay the necessary structures for the enhancement of economic relations. 

Policy Responses and Recommendations

India and Pakistan have implemented counterterrorism strategies at the level of the national government that are weighed in contrast to economic interests. Some of these policies include the acquisition of new military equipment, training, and more spending on national security. The sustainability of the forces thus seriously is affected by these measures, which are indispensable but also steal financial resources from the needy spot of social welfare and development projects. The adjustment of the balance of the needs of the economy and security is critical. One of the means is the role of regional cooperation projects in addressing the economic repercussions of terrorist activities. These goals will be effectively achieved through the joint efforts of South Asian countries in policy areas such as intelligence sharing, coordinated counterterrorism operations with other neighbouring countries, and mutual economic interactions. To cope with the issues of terrorism on individual economies and the pursuit of together common growth, regional trade agreements and economic integration programs should be promoted. Along with economic well-being, the issue of terrorism tackles projects that can obtain another country’s cooperation and action. National and regional counterterrorism programs can be developed through money, technical help, and capacity building from international organizations and donor countries. The participation of other nations in military action in conjunction with the U.K. is essential for the effectiveness of the strategy. They should also provide funds to them to allow them to positively react in the global fight against terrorism. The findings infer that international cooperation is the key to reinforcing the counterterrorism strategic system and fostering economic development in terrorism consequences-hit areas, as Rehman et al. (2017) state.

Conclusion

The economic effects of terrorism in India and Pakistan emphasize leaving separate routes for financial resilience and stability in the South Asia region. Both countries are facing significant direct and indirect costs of terrorism, which are caused by infrastructure damage, loss of life, disrupted trade, and increased defence spending. Apart from these strictly socio-economic factors, there are also points impeding their long-term growth prospects. Pakistan is similar to the former in terms of being less advantaged, as it is polity-dependent and very often it is also subject to security dangers. Conversely, India is lucky to have a very nonstandard economy and strong structure, which makes them less vulnerable to the same things. The optimal economic coping of these negative impacts is a result of well-conceived security and growth policies. Not only can saccades be reduced, but stability and resilience can also be strengthened through regional collaboration, which might encompass the sharing of intelligence and SAFTA-style integration programs. On the other hand, counterterrorism strategies and sustainable economic growth require the provision of cooperation and support from abroad. A shared vision for a more peaceful and prosperous South Asia can be realized by the cooperation of India and Pakistan, which can help in the resolution of the disputes and move towards mutually beneficial economic ties, which in turn lead to a more thriving and stable South Asia. 

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect the views of the Government of India and Defence Research and Studies

Title Image Courtesy: The Diplomat

References:

1. Bajoria, J. (2016). The economics of Indian defence spending. Council on Foreign Relations. 

2. Byman, D. (2015). Al Qaeda, the Islamic State, and the global jihadist movement: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press. 

3. Chari, P. R. (2012). Across the Line of Control: Inside Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir. Columbia University Press. 

4.Chowdhury, R. (2011). The shattered dream: Understanding Pakistan’s military and terrorist fiascos. HarperCollins India. 

5.Crenshaw, M. (1981). The causes of terrorism. Comparative Politics, 13(4), 379-399. 

6. Enders, W., & Sandler, T. (2000). Is transnational terrorism becoming more threatening? A time-series investigation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44(3), 307-332. 

7. Fair, C. C. (2014). Fighting to the end: The Pakistan Army’s way of war. Oxford University Press. 

8. Ganguly, S. (2002). The Kashmir question and the Indo-Pakistani conflict. Asian Survey, 42(2), 214-237. 

9.Hoffman, B. (1998). Inside terrorism. Columbia University Press. 

10. Khan, F. A. (2017). Understanding Pakistan’s terrorism discourse. Oxford University Press. 

11.Krueger, A. B., & Maleckova, J. (2003). Education, poverty, and terrorism: Is there a causal connection? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 119-144. 

12. Laqueur, W. (2003). A history of terrorism. Transaction Publishers. 

13. Estrada, M. A. R., Park, D., Kim, J. S., & Khan, A. (2015). The economic impact of terrorism: A new model and its application to Pakistan. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(6), 1065-1080. 

14. Gaibulloev, K., & Sandler, T. (2019). What we have learned about terrorism since 9/11. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(2), 275-328. 

15. Ismail, A., & Amjad, S. (2014). Determinants of terrorism in Pakistan: An empirical investigation. Economic Modelling, 37, 320-331. 

16.Mamoon, D., & Murshed, S. M. (2010). The conflict mitigating effects of trade in the India-Pakistan case. Economics of Governance, 11(2), 145-167. 

17. Rehman, F. U., Nasir, M., & Shahbaz, M. (2017). What have we learned? Assessing the effectiveness of counterterrorism strategies in Pakistan. Economic Modelling, 64, 487-495.

Title image courtesy:

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect the views of the Government of India and Defence Research and Studies